Macrocycles and Acyclic Cucurbit[n]urils as Pseudo[2]catenane Partners for Long-Acting Neuromuscular Blocks and Rapid Reversal In Vivo.

Long-acting neuromuscular blocks followed by rapid reversal may provide prolonged surgeries with improved conditions by omitting repetitive or continuous administration of the neuromuscular blocking agent (NMBA), eliminating residual neuromuscular block and minimizing postoperative recovery, which, however, is not clinically available. Here, we demonstrate that imidazolium-based macrocycles (IMCs) and acyclic cucurbit[n]urils (ACBs) can form such partners by functioning as long-acting NMBAs and rapid reversal agents through a pseudo[2]catenation mechanism based on stable complexation with Ka values of over 109 M-1. In vivo experiments with rats reveal that, at the dose of 2- and 3-fold ED90, one IMC attains a duration of action corresponding to 158 or 442 min for human adults, covering most of prolonged surgeries. The block can be reversed by one ACB with recovery time significantly shorter than that achieved by sugammadex for reversing the block of rocuronium, the clinically most widely used intermediate-acting NMBA.

Effect of sugammadex administration on neural tube development in 48-h chick embryos.

Sugammadex is a new generation drug that has led to significant changes in the practice of anesthesia. However, its effects on fetal development are not yet fully known. The aim of this study is to investigate the teratogenic effects of sugammadex on neural tube and embryonic development in early chick embryos. In this study, 50 0-day fertile specific non-pathogenic (SPF) eggs were used. Fifty eggs were divided into 5 different groups, each consisting of 10 pieces. While no substance was given to the control group at the 28th hour of the study, 4 different doses of sugammadex were administered to the experimental groups, respectively 2, 4, 8, 16 mg/kg. Cranio-caudal lengths of embryos, somite numbers, average number of argyrophilic nucleolar regulatory regions (AgNOR) per nucleus, total AgNOR area/total nuclear area (TAA/NA) ratios, Caspase-3 H-Score results, and presence of neural tube defect were compared among the groups. While the mean cranio-caudal lengths, somite counts, TAA/NA ratios and AgNOR counts of the embryos were found to be statistically significantly lower than the control group, Caspase-3 H-Score mean results were found to be significantly higher (p < .05). In addition, it was observed that there was an increase in neural tube patency and developmental delay. As a result, sugammadex crossing the placenta was revealed to increase the release of proapopitotic molecules and disrupt the developmental stages of embryos. Thus, it was determined that sugammadex in increased developmental delay and incidence of neural tube defects in early chick embryos with increased dose dependent. Despite these results, the effects of sugammadex on fetal development in in vivo and in vitro environments should be studied with further studies. RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS: Sugammadex is a new generation drug that has led to significant changes in the practice of anesthesia. However, its effects on fetal development are not yet fully known. It has been observed that different doses of sugammadex increase the risk of neural tube defect development on chick embryos and slow the embryo development in a dose-dependent manner.

Sugammadex for reversal of moderate-to-deep rocuronium block in a clinical setting: A retrospective report of 10 dogs.

OBJECTIVE: To compare recovery times of sugammadex with spontaneous recovery from rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block (NMB) in dogs. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective, unmatchedcase-control study. ANIMALS: A total of 10 dogs administered sugammadex and 10 dogs recovering spontaneously from rocuronium-induced NMB. METHODS: Files of dogs administered rocuronium between March and August 2023 were inspected. The train-of-four (TOF) count at the time of sugammadex administration and the time between administration and TOF ratio >90% (recovery time) were recorded. The recovery time for those not administered reversal agents was considered from the first TOF value >0 until TOF ratio >90%. The dose of sugammadex and the cumulative dose of rocuronium were recorded. Rocuronium doses and recovery times were compared using Mann-Whitney tests. The coefficient of determination (R2) between the cumulative rocuronium dose and sugammadex dose and the recovery time were calculated. RESULTS: Dogs in the sugammadex and spontaneous recovery groups were administered intravenously (IV) 0.76 (0.4-2.6) and 0.61 (0.3-2.9) mg kg-1 of rocuronium, respectively (p = 0.325). Recovery time after 3.9 (2.9-5.5) mg kg-1 of sugammadex IV was 1 (1-3) minutes and was 20 (10-35) min for spontaneous recovery (p < 0.0001). The R2 for rocuronium and sugammadex doses and recovery times were 0.19 (p = 0.2) and 0.012 (p = 0.758). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Sugammadex 2.9-5.5 mg kg-1 reversed moderate (TOF count 1-3) or deep (TOF count 0) rocuronium-induced NMB within 3 minutes, substantially faster than spontaneous recovery.

Reversal of rocuronium induced neuromuscular block with sugammadex in patients under 2 years of age. A series of 280 cases.

AIM: Neuromuscular muscle relaxants are still indispensable for surgical procedures requiring general anesthesia, and the use of these agents may result in postoperative residual curarization. Sugammadex may offer a distinct advantage to pediatric patients where residual neuromuscular blockade may be poorly tolerated. Sugammadex is approved for use in adults and children over two years. This is the main reason why large-scale studies could not be conducted in the group of patients younger than two years old. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sugammadex for reversing deep rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade in children under two years of age. METHODS: Pediatric patients younger than two years of age who underwent neurosurgery under sevoflurane anesthesia were included in the study. Neuromuscular block was achieved by the administration of rocuronium. It was antagonized by the administration of 5 mg/kg sugammadex and evaluated using train-of-four (TOF). Primary outcome measure was the time from sugammadex administration to return of the TOF ratio to 0,9. Postoperative adverse events were also recorded. RESULTS: Two hundred eighty patients (10 day-24 months of age; 3-18 kg) were included in this study. Reversal of deep rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block with sugammadex was rapid in all patients. No residual curarization or recurarization was observed. No adverse events or hypersensitivity reactions were observed after administration of sugammadex. CONCLUSION: Reversal of rocuronium-induced deep neuromuscular block in infants was rapid and safe. Sugammadex provided safe extubation in patients younger than two years of age who had undergone neurosurgery. Research Fund. KEY WORDS: Neuromuscular blockade, Neuromuscular monitoring, Pediatrics, Sugammadex.

The arousal effect of sugammadex reversal of neuromuscular blockade differs with anesthetic depth in propofol-remifentanil anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial.

Sugammadex reverses neuromuscular blockade by encapsulating steroidal neuromuscular blockers; therefore, it does not pharmacologically affect sedation levels. However, some clinicians avoid using it because of sudden unwanted acting out or patient arousal. Previous studies suggested sugammadex-induced awakening, but frontal muscle contraction after sugammadex administration compromised reliability of results obtained from EEG-based anesthesia depth monitoring tools like bispectral index (BIS). We hypothesized that sugammadex would affect patients' arousal depending on their baseline levels of sedation. We evaluated arousal signs after sugammadex administration with BIS between 25 - 35 and 45 - 55 under steady-state propofol-remifentanil anesthesia at the end of a surgery (n = 33 in each group). After sugammadex administration, twelve patients with a BIS of 45 - 55 showed clinical signs of awakening but none with a BIS of 25 - 35 (36.4% vs. 0%, P = 0.001). The distribution of the modified observer's assessment of alertness/sedation scale scores was also significantly different between the two groups (P < 0.001). Changes in the BIS were significantly greater in the BIS 45 - 55 than in the 25 - 35 group (median difference, 7; 95% CI 2 - 19, P = 0.002). Arousal after sugammadex was affected by patient sedation levels, and clinical signs of awakening appeared only in those with BIS 45 - 55. Unwanted arousal of the patient should be considered when using sugammadex under shallow anesthesia.Clinical trial registry number: Clinical Trial Registry of Korea ( https://cris.nih.go.kr ; Principal investigator: Jieae Kim; Registration number: KCT0006248; Date of first registration: 11/06/2021).

Effect of intraoperative muscle relaxation reversal on the success rate of motor evoked potential recording in patients undergoing spinal surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Partial neuromuscular blockade (NMB) has been applied for some surgeries to reduce bleeding and prevent patient movement for spinal surgery. Sugammadex selectively binds to rocuronium in the plasma and consequently lowers the rocuronium concentration at the neuromuscular junction. In this study, we aimed to observe whether the success rate of transcranial motor-evoked potential (TceMEP) can be increased by sugammadex compared with partial NMB during spinal surgery. METHODS: Patients who underwent elective spinal surgery with TceMEP monitoring were randomly assigned to the sugammadex group and control group. Rocuronium was continuously infused to maintain the train of four counts (TOFc) = 2. The sugammadex group discontinued rocuronium infusion at the time of TceMEP monitoring and was infused with 2 mg/kg sugammadex; the control group was infused with the same dose of saline. RESULTS: A total of 171 patients were included. The success rate of TceMEP monitoring in the sugammadex group was significantly higher than that in the control group. TceMEP amplitudes were greater in the sugammadex group than in the control group at 5 min, 10 min, and 20 min after the start of motor-evoked potential monitoring. The latencies of upper extremity TceMEPs monitoring showed no difference between groups. TOF ratios were greater in the sugammadex group at 5 min, 10 min, and 20 min after the start of motor-evoked potential monitoring. There were no adverse effects caused by sugammadex. CONCLUSIONS: Sugammadex can improve the success rate of motor-evoked potential monitoring compared with moderate neuromuscular blockade induced by continuous infusion of rocuronium in spinal surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered on clinicaltrials.gov.cn on 29/10/2020 (trial registration number: NCT04608682).

Sugammadex for reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade during alfaxalone anesthesia in dogs.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the reversal effect of sugammadex on neuromuscular blockade induced by a single bolus of rocuronium in dogs under alfaxalone anesthesia. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized, prospective, crossover experimental study. ANIMALS: A group of six adult Beagle dogs (three females and three males), weighing 11.3-15.8 kg and aged 6-8 years, were used. METHODS: Dogs were anesthetized twice with a 1.25 times minimum infusion rate of alfaxalone, with a washout period of at least 14 days between experiments. Neuromuscular function was monitored using acceleromyography with train-of-four (TOF) stimulation of the peroneal nerve. After recording the control TOF ratio (TOFRC), rocuronium (0.5 mg kg-1) was administered intravenously. Subsequently, sugammadex (4 mg kg-1) or an equal volume of saline (control treatment) was administered intravenously when the TOF count returned from 0 to 1 after neuromuscular blockade. Time from rocuronium injection to TOF count = 0 (onset time), time from TOF count = 0 to TOF count = 1 (maximum blockade period), time of first twitch amplitude recovery from 0.25 to 0.75 (recovery index), and time from sugammadex or saline administration to TOF ratio/TOFRC ≥ 0.9 (recovery time) were recorded. RESULTS: The onset time and maximum blockade duration did not differ between sugammadex treatment [1.2 (0.7-1.5) minutes and 9.9 (6.3-10.5) minutes, respectively] and control treatment [median (range); 1.0 (0.7-1.1) minutes and 9.9 (8.8-11.5) minutes, respectively] (p = 0.219 and 0.844, respectively). Recovery index was 0.5 (0.3-0.7) minutes in sugammadex treatment, which was shorter than that in control treatment [4.5 (3.7-4.9) minutes] (p = 0.031). Recovery time was 0.8 (0.5-2.8) minutes in sugammadex treatment, which was shorter than that in control treatment [10.5 (6.8-14.3) minutes] (p = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade was effectively reversed by sugammadex in dogs anesthetized with alfaxalone.

The influence of different sugammadex doses on neural tube development in early-stage chick embryos.

BACKGROUND: Sugammadex is a modified gamma-cyclodextrin that has been developed with the goal of reversing the steroidal neuromuscular blocking agents. The aim of the present study is to investigate the effects of different sugammadex doses on embryologic and neural tube development in an early-stage chick embryo model. METHODS: A total of 100 specific pathogen-free, fertilized domestic chicken eggs were randomly divided into five groups (n = 20, each), and placed in an automatic cycle incubator. The eggs in the "control (C)" group were incubated without administration of any drug till the end of the experiment. Sub-blastodermic administration of 0.9% NaCl as vehicle control (VC) and different doses of sugammadex solutions prepared with the latter [2 mg/mL (LD), 4 mg/mL (MD), 16 mg/mL (HD)] were performed at 30 hr of incubation. All embryos were removed from the eggs at 72 hr when they were expected to reach Hamburger-Hamilton (HH) stages 19-20, then they were fixed, and evaluated histo-morphologically. RESULTS: Embryonic development was not observed in 11 eggs (1 in C, 1 in VC; 3 in LD, 3 in MD, and 3 in HD). All the developed embryos were compatible with the HH stages 19-20. A neural tube closure defect was detected in one embryo in the HD group. No statistically significant difference was found between the groups in terms of embryonic and neural tube developments. CONCLUSIONS: No significant association was found between the drug and adverse outcomes; however, a trend with dosing was seen. Further studies are required before conclude on safety and extrapolate these results to human beings.

Effect of sugammadex on processed EEG parameters in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

BACKGROUND: Sugammadex has been associated with increases in the bispectral index (BIS). We evaluated the effects of sugammadex administration on quantitative electroencephalographic (EEG) and electromyographic (EMG) measures. METHODS: We performed a prospective observational study of adult male patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. All patients received a sevoflurane-based general anaesthetic and a continuous infusion of rocuronium, which was reversed with 2 mg kg-1 of sugammadex i.v. BIS, EEG, and EMG measures were captured with the BIS Vista™ monitor. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were included in this study. Compared with baseline, BIS increased at 4-6 min (ß coefficient: 3.63; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.22-5.04; P<0.001), spectral edge frequency 95 (SEF95) increased at 2-4 min (ß coefficient: 0.29; 95% CI: 0.05-0.52; P=0.016) and 4-6 min (ß coefficient: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.47-0.94; P<0.001), and EMG increased at 4-6 min (ß coefficient: 1.91; 95% CI: 1.00-2.81; P<0.001) after sugammadex administration. Compared with baseline, increased beta power was observed at 2-4 min (ß coefficient: 93; 95% CI: 1-185; P=0.046) and 4-6 min (ß coefficient: 208; 95% CI: 116-300; P<0.001), and decreased delta power was observed at 4-6 min (ß coefficient: -526.72; 95% CI: -778 to -276; P<0.001) after sugammadex administration. Neither SEF95 nor frequency band data analysis adjusted for EMG showed substantial differences. None of the patients showed clinical signs of awakening. CONCLUSIONS: After neuromuscular block reversal with 2 mg kg-1 sugammadex, BIS, SEF95, EMG, and beta power showed small but statistically significant increases over time, while delta power decreased.

Rocuronium-neuromuscular blockade does not influence the patient state index in anesthetized dogs.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of rocuronium and sugammadex on the patient state index (PSI) in dogs anesthetized with propofol. ANIMALS: 6 intact healthy male Beagles. PROCEDURES: Anesthesia was induced with and maintained on a propofol infusion. The estimated plasma propofol concentration (ePC) was recorded. Baseline PSI and train-of-four ratio (TOFR) readings were collected for 2 minutes in stable general anesthesia. Neuromuscular blockade (NMB) was induced with 0.6 mg/kg, IV, rocuronium, and full NMB was confirmed with a TOFR of 0. After 5 minutes, the neuromuscular function was restored with 4 mg/kg sugammadex, IV (reversal), and monitored for 5 minutes. Throughout the data collection, ePC, PSI, and TOFR were recorded every 15 seconds and compared with mixed-effect ANOVA. RESULTS: Baseline ePC, PSI, and TOFR were 3.63 ± 0.38, 41 ± 6, and 0.97 ± 0.08 µg/mL, respectively. There was no difference between the baseline of ePC and PSI from NMB or reversal. Compared to the baseline, the TOFR decreased to 0 with NMB (P < .001) and returned to 0.96 ± 0.08 (P = .721) on reversal. After 5 minutes, sugammadex fully reversed 5 out of 6 dogs to TOFR > 0.90 and partially reversed 1 animal to TOFR = 0.80. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: There was no evidence that NMB with rocuronium and sugammadex-induced reversal interfered with PSI readings under steady-state total intravenous anesthesia with propofol. Further evaluation of PSI is warranted to assess its utility in a clinical population to detect changes in levels of consciousness during NMB.

Investigation of the effect of sugammadex on glutamate-induced neurotoxicity in C6 cell line and the roles played by nitric oxide and oxidative stress pathways.

This experiment was intended to evaluate the effect of sugammadex on the cytotoxicity induced by glutamate, involving the nitric oxide and oxidative stress pathways. C6 glioma cells were used in the study. Glutamate was given to cells in the glutamate group for 24 h. Sugammadex at different concentrations was given to cells in the sugammadex group for 24 h. Cells in the sugammadex + glutamate group were pre-treated with sugammadex at various concentrations for 1 h and then exposed to glutamate for 24 h. XTT assay was used to assess cell viability. Levels of nitric oxide (NO), neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS), total antioxidant (TAS), and total oxidant (TOS) in the cells were calculated using commercial kits. Apoptosis was detected by TUNEL assay. Sugammadex at concentrations of 50 and 100 µg/mL significantly enhanced the cell viability in C6 cells after the cytotoxicity induced by glutamate (p < 0.001). Moreover, sugammadex considerably decreased the levels of nNOS NO and TOS and the number of apoptotic cells and increased the level of TAS (p < 0.001). Sugammadex has protective and antioxidant properties on cytotoxicity and could be an effective supplement for neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer and Parkinson if further research in vivo supports this claim.

The effects of sugammadex on gastric ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats: Biochemical and histopathological evaluation.

The primary sources of reactive oxygen species (ROS) that cause ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injuries are enzymes xanthine oxidase (XO) and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidases (NOXs) in the literature, whereby one of the main ROS producing cells via NOX activity are polymophonuclear leukocytes (PNL). Sugammadex, the effect of which we plan to research against gastric I/R damage, is a modified gamma-cyclodextrin that antagonizes the action of steroidal neuromuscular blocking drugs. Previous studies have reported that sugammadex inhibits PNL infiltration. However, it is unknown whether an inhibitory effect on XO is present. We aimed to biochemically and histopathologically investigate the effects of sugammadex on I/R-induced stomach damage in rats. The animals were divided into groups that underwent gastric ischemia-reperfusion (GIR), 4 mg/kg sugammadex + gastric ischemia-reperfusion (SGIR), and a sham operation group (SG). The effect of sugammadex was evaluated by measuring oxidant-antioxidant and PNL parameters. There was no significant difference in XO levels between the SGIR and GIR groups. In the SGIR group, sugammadex inhibited the increase in myeloperoxidase (MPO) and malondialdehyde (MDA) levels (p < 0.001). The amount of MDA and MPO in the SGIR group was similar as in the SG group. Sugammadex significantly suppressed the decrease in tGSH levels in the SGIR group (p < 0.001). The difference between tGSH levels in the SG and SGIR groups was slight. In the SGIR group, sugammadex significantly suppressed the increase in tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and interleukin 1 beta (IL1-ß) levels compared to the GIR group (p < 0.001). Additionally, sugammadex corrected histopathological modifications as much as sham group. In conclusion, sugammadex may be beneficial in preventing oxidative stress.

Effect of Sugammadex During Transcranial Electrical Motor Evoked Potentials Monitoring in Spinal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Neuromuscular blockade suppresses transcranial electrical motor evoked potential (TceMEP) amplitude and is usually avoided during TceMEP monitoring. In this randomized controlled trial, we investigated whether rocuronium-induced suppression of TceMEP amplitude could be reversed by sugammadex in patients undergoing spine surgery. METHODS: Seventy-six patients undergoing spinal surgery were randomly allocated into sugammadex and control groups. In the sugammadex group, a rocuronium infusion was titrated to maintain moderate neuromuscular blockade (2 twitches on train-of-four) until dural opening when the rocuronium infusion was discontinued and 2 mg/kg sugammadex administered. In the control group, no neuromuscular blockade was administered after induction of anesthesia. The primary outcome was a comparison between sugammadex and control groups of mean TceMEP amplitudes in the abductor pollicis brevis muscles of both upper extremities 5 minutes after dural. Secondary outcomes included TceMEP amplitudes at 10, 20, 30, and 60 minutes after dural opening. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients were included in the analysis. TceMEP amplitudes were significantly greater in the sugammadex group (629 µV, interquartile range: 987 µV) than in the control group (502 µV, interquartile range: 577 µV; P =0.033) at 5 minutes after dural opening. TceMEP amplitudes were also greater in the sugammadex group at 10 minutes ( P =0.0010), 20 minutes ( P =0.003), 30 minutes ( P =0.001), and 60 minutes ( P =0.003) after dural opening. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate neuromuscular blockade induced by continuous infusion of rocuronium was effectively reversed by sugammadex. This suggests that sugammadex could be used to enhance TceMEP waveform monitoring during spine surgery requiring muscle relaxation.

Association of sugammadex reversal of neuromuscular block and postoperative length of stay in the ambulatory care facility: a multicentre hospital registry study.

BACKGROUND: Encapsulation of rocuronium or vecuronium with sugammadex can reverse neuromuscular block faster than neostigmine reversal. This pharmacodynamic profile might facilitate patient discharge after ambulatory surgery. METHODS: We included patients who underwent ambulatory surgery with general anaesthesia and neuromuscular block between 2016 and 2021 from hospital registries at two large academic healthcare networks in the USA. The primary outcome was postoperative length of stay in the ambulatory care facility (PLOS-ACF). We examined post hoc whether the type of reversal affects postoperative nausea and vomiting and direct hospital costs. RESULTS: Among the 29 316 patients included, 8945 (30.5%) received sugammadex and 20 371 (69.5%) received neostigmine for reversal. PLOS-ACF and costs were lower in patients who received sugammadex vs neostigmine (adjusted difference in PLOS-ACF: -9.5 min; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], -10.5 to -8.5 min; adjusted difference in direct hospital costs: -US$77; 95% CI, -$88 to -$66; respectively; P<0.001). The association was magnified in patients over age 65 yr, with ASA physical status >2 undergoing short procedures (<2 h) (adjusted difference in PLOS-ACF: -18.2 min; 95% CI, -23.8 to -12.4 min; adjusted difference in direct hospital costs: -$176; 95% CI, -$220 to -$128; P<0.001). Sugammadex use was associated with reduced postoperative nausea and vomiting (17.2% vs 19.6%, P<0.001), which mediated its effects on length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: Reversal with sugammadex compared with neostigmine was associated with a small decrease in postoperative length of stay in the ambulatory care unit. The effect was magnified in older and high-risk patients, and can be explained by reduced postoperative nausea and vomiting. Sugammadex reversal in ambulatory surgery may also help reduce cost of care.

A prospective observational study of the effects of sugammadex on peri-operative oestrogen and progesterone levels in women who take hormonal contraception.

Pharmacokinetic modelling suggests that sugammadex may interact with endogenous progesterone and reduce levels by 34% in patients taking hormonal contraception. Due to this potential interaction that may be equivalent to missing one dose of an oral contraceptive pill, both the manufacturer and professional anaesthesia organisations recommend counselling patients to use additional non-hormonal contraception after administration of sugammadex. We performed a prospective observational study examining the changes in serum oestrogen and progesterone concentrations in premenopausal adult women undergoing an operative procedure. Sixty participants who were on hormonal contraception received sugammadex. Two additional control groups were recruited, consisting of 30 participants who were not on hormonal contraception and did not receive sugammadex, and 32 who were not on hormonal contraception and did receive sugammadex. Three blood samples were taken: before sugammadex; 15 min post-sugammadex; and 240 min post-sugammadex or end of operating theatre time. Median oestrogen levels decreased from baseline by around 40% at 240 min in all three groups (p ≤ 0.001). Progesterone levels rose significantly at 15 min (p = 0.002) in patients on contraception then decreased non-significantly to 20% below baseline at 240 min. The decrease in oestrogen and the rise in progesterone could both act to minimise the risk of ovulation and thus protect contraception in this population. We found no evidence of a change in hormone levels that might threaten contraceptive efficacy in women on hormonal contraception receiving sugammadex.

Evaluation of the effects of bupivacaine combined with sugammadex on the duration of the nociceptive blockade in sciatic nerve blocks: a controlled, double-blind animal study.

BACKGROUND: Animal and other experimental studies have demonstrated increased block time and quality when α- and ß-cyclodextrin drugs are combined with local anesthetics. However, to our knowledge, no study has utilized γ-cyclodextrins in such a combination. In the present study, we used an animal model to evaluate the effects of different doses of the combined administration of γ-cyclodextrin (sugammadex) and bupivacaine on the duration of sciatic nerve blocks in rats. METHODS: Sciatic nerve blocks were performed with a 0.20 ml mixture in all groups. For the non-experimental groups, this mixture consisted of 0.2 ml saline (Sham group), 0.2 ml sugammadex (Group S), or 0.16 ml bupivacaine 0.5% and 0.04 ml saline (Group B). For the experimental groups, 0.16 ml bupivacaine 0.5% was administered along with 0.01 ml sugammadex and 0.03 ml saline (Group BS1), 0.02 ml sugammadex and 0.02 ml saline (Group BS2), or 0.04 ml sugammadex (Group BS4). Proprioception, nociception, and motor function were evaluated until the sciatic block was completely reversed. RESULTS: Motor, proprioceptive, and nociceptive blockades occurred within 5 min in all experimental groups. In Group BS4, the duration of the motor, proprioceptive, and nociceptive blockades was significantly increased compared with the other experimental groups. However, in Groups BS1 and BS2, only the duration of the nociceptive blockade was significantly increased. CONCLUSIONS: The combined administration of sugammadex and bupivacaine for sciatic nerve blocks in rats led to a significant increase in the duration of motor, proprioceptive, and nociceptive blockades.

Retrospective observational study of the effects of residual neuromuscular blockade and sugammadex on motor-evoked potential monitoring during spine surgery in Japan.

Given neuromuscular blockade (NMB) can affect the amplitude and detection success rate of motor-evoked potentials (MEP), sugammadex may be administered intraoperatively. We evaluated the factors affecting the degree of residual NMB (i.e., the train-of-four [TOF] ratio) and the relationship between TOF ratio and MEP detection success rate in Japanese patients undergoing spine surgery. This single-center retrospective observational study included adults who underwent spine surgery under propofol/remifentanil anesthesia, received rocuronium for intubation, and underwent myogenic MEP monitoring after transcranial stimulation. TOF ratios were assessed using electromyography. Sugammadex was administered after finishing the MEP setting and the TOF ratio was ≤0.7. To identify factors affecting the TOF ratio, TOF ratio and MEP detection success rate were simultaneously measured after finishing the MEP setting; to compare the time from intubation to the start of MEP monitoring after NMB recovery between sugammadex and spontaneous recovery groups, multivariable analyses were performed. Of 373 cases analyzed, sugammadex was administered to 221 (59.2%) cases. Age, blood pressure, hepatic impairment, and rocuronium dose were the main factors affecting the TOF ratio. Patients with higher TOF ratios (≥0.75) had higher MEP detection success rates. The time from intubation to the start of MEP monitoring after NMB recovery was significantly shorter in patients administered sugammadex versus patients without sugammadex (P < .0001). The MEP detection success rate was higher in patients with a TOF ratio of ≥0.75. Sugammadex shortened the time from intubation to the start of MEP monitoring after NMB recovery.